home

RI-WINS Town Hall Re-Cap, Part II

Posted by Brian

RI-WINS Town Hall

Here’s a summary of the Q&A from the RI-WINS town hall. It’s mostly paraphrased/summarized (see the video for verbatim; I’ve included the timestamps for each question/answer to make it easier for you to locate them).

If you have any questions or clarifications, please post them in the comments. And if you’d like to be identified as one of the questioners, let me know (you’re anonymous by default).

27:49-32:22
How do Verizon and other carriers perceive this initiative as regards their own initiatives such as EVDO?

Bob Panoff replied that Verizon was one of the first companies they contacted. He went on to say that the goal of this initiative is to foster applications that work across interoperable wireless networks. He also mentioned that RI-WINS has been talking with Cox about how they might work together. Tracy Williams pointed out that a lot of the focus of private sector wireless has been the Route 95 corridor, but that RI-WINS aims to establish a consistent wireless footprint across the state.

32:23-36:18
What about bringing access into people’s homes (targeting the consumers in Rhode Island)?

Bob replied that the initial focus is on enterprises and institutions (RI-WINS is more of a wholesale provider of wireless access, with the enterprises and institutions providing user-facing capabilities). He said that there will ultimately be an “innovative approach to consumers”, but that they will work with partners and affinity groups who will develop consumer-facing offerings.

36:19-39:30
What will the hardware look like from a consumer viewpoint? Users with a WiMAX card in their laptop? A WiMAX enabled home router that creates a Wi-Fi cloud?

Bob answered that there’s no definite answer on this, but he thinks we are moving toward a multi-protocol world (cell, Wi-Fi, WiMAX) with seamless hand-off when roaming between clouds of wireless.

39:31-47:44
As a followup to the last question, what sort of equipment should contest entrants plan on using for their N-GEN Wireless World contest entries?

In response, Bob pulled a Navini WiMAX PC Card out of his pocket :-) For the immediate future, the network is based on pre-WiMAX technology. As an aside, RI-WINS initially considered Wi-Fi, but it would have taken 9,000 access points! With WiMAX, it will only take 120 base stations (I’d love to see that on a Google map!). However, Wi-Fi hotspots will play a part. Don Stanford pointed out that WiMAX is being widely touted as an alternative to 3G/4G, but that the infrastructure is very affordable and flexible.

47:45-52:14
Are there any compatible WiMAX cards that are suitable for embedded systems/sensor network development (either Compact Flash-based cards with Linux drivers or serial-WiMAX bridges for bare metal development)?

Don replied that these sorts of devices will eventually come. Maybe they’ll even be invented in Rhode Island! To that point, Bob pointed out that RI-WINS would really like to see the network used for ocean research. Don mentioned that port security is another big area for RI-WINS.

52:15-54:03
Is the lack of a strong commitment to consumer access on the part of RI-WINS a policy choice, economic choice, or something else?

Bob replied that it’s a combination of things:


  • The state of technology is definitely an issue (the WiMAX hardware won’t be widely available to consumers soon enough).

  • By not tackling consumer access at this point, complicated questions of acceptable use can be deferred (some of those issues-especially file sharing-bring major bandwidth issues along with them).


54:04-55:38
Putting aside the broad consumer market for the moment, what if the question is changed to individuals-people not tied to an institution?

Bob replied that RI-WINS is very committed to this kind of use, but that it will be through intermediaries who build solutions on top of RI-WINS. He mentioned that we could eventually see policy/government entities working with RI-WINS to underwrite/subsidize low-cost access to users. But all this is a later phase-and that these sort of features will be added incrementally.

55:39-56:52
Could municipalities sign up with RI-WINS to provide access to their citizens?

Bob replied that RI-WINS is talking to one community that is not well-served by broadband, and they are looking to provide low-cost or free service to people who are unable to afford other solutions.

56:53-57:55
What kind of operating budget does RI-WINS have?

Bob replied that they have some seed money from the state government, a grant from homeland security. [Unfortunately, I couldn’t make out the actual amount that Bob quoted, but I’ll get that info and put it in here].

4 Responses to “RI-WINS Town Hall Re-Cap, Part II”

  1. Michael C
    June 30th, 2006 08:54
    1

    Hi Brian,

    I noticed that Sheila Lennon covered the RI-WINS in today’s Journal; congrats for the coverage!

    As an ancillary victim of jokes about access “in the woods” let me clarify: I live in the very town mentioned indirectly by RI-WINS staff. It is an ongoing battle to get high speed, and many residents are upset at the inability to get cable TV or internet access from the firm which has a virtual monopoly on it in RI. No DSL options either. So we can go the Hughes route (formerly DirecWay, at $600 install/$60 month) for potentially unreliable satellite service, or dialup.

    Point being: many in this agriculture-driven town have small, home-based businesses or small working farms. The economic pressures being brought to bear on them – especially farmers – is profound and well-documented. To have robust connectivity would provide direct economic benefits not currently available.

    Whether through a partnership with this aforementioned virtual monopoly or by itself, it would be wonderful if RI-WINS considered committing resources to addressing this town’s plight. I am not a farmer or a politician and I don’t play one on TV, and was at the RI-WINS presentation (great stuff)!

    But this is a long-standing way of life in RI being constrained by seemingly avoidable limits placed on its economic growth.

    The University we both attended is a land-grant institution with a strong agricultural commitment, still. Why does that commitment always seem to stop at the Scituate / Glocester / Coventry line?

    – some newb in the woods

  2. Brian
    June 30th, 2006 09:11
    2

    Michael,

    I think that there is an invisible barrier between that land-grant institution and the northern part of the state…you can usually hear me complaining about how URI seems invisible to the folks in the State House. But maybe that barrier blocks things both ways.

    If there are projects or people who need to connect with folks down here in Kingston, please let me know, and I’ll ask some of the folks I know at URI how best to make the connections.

    P.S. When Sheila and I were goofing on “in the woods”, it was in the context of getting wireless access while camping—we didn’t mean it as a slight against the rural parts of RI.

  3. Bob Panoff
    July 1st, 2006 15:09
    3

    Michael and Sheila,

    Getting coverage into the rural areas of RI is exactly what RI-WINs is about. That’s what border-to-border and ubiquitous mean to the BIF and the project team. We will take innovative approaches to doing so, but can’t do everything at once. There was some mention of working with a “monopoly”. RI-WINs will work with everyone, and be totally open to incumbents and independents alike. The RI-WINs team is actively engaged in conversations with service providers of both types, and will continue to do so.

    We enjoyed the Town Meeting very much, and think these comments are also great. Please give us all your suggestions. Best, BP

  4. Brian Jepson’s Weblog » Blog Archive » Rhode Island’s Border-to-Border Wireless Network
    July 3rd, 2006 15:02
    4

    [...] Find out more in the event coverage: Part I and Part II. [...]

Leave a Reply


Picture of cover of
Providence Geeks is a member of the RI Nexus Community

To join our very-low-volume announcement list, please send an email to jtemplin [at] gmail [dot] com.

Feeds

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)
  • Calendar (iCal)
  • Calendar (XML)

Blogroll

Adam Darowski
Allan Tear
Andrew Gilmartin
Andrew Shearer
Brian Jepson
Brown CS Events
Christopher Fowler
Connect Providence
Dan Hodge
Francisco Assis Rosa
Hilary Mason
James Yoneda
Jef Nickerson
Jim Rizzo
Joe Alba
John Duksta
Kathi Fisler
Not for Nothing
Owen Johnson
Pamela O’Hare
Rhode Island’s Future
Richard Brownell
Shriram Krishnamurthi
Steve Pasetti
Subterranean Homepage News
Tom Hoffman
WillisBros.net

Categories

Archive

Meta